David Alan Grimes
(born February 18, 1947) is an American physician and abortion
provider who is certified in both obstetrics and gynecology and in preventive medicine. He is known for his
research into abortion.
INTERNET
SOURCE: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Grimes_(physician)
Education
Grimes
received his undergraduate degree in biology from Harvard University, after which he attended
medical school at the University of North Carolina. He later
earned certification from the American
Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology, after which he was also certified in
Public Health and General Preventive Medicine from the American Board of Preventive
Medicine.
Career
Grimes
performed his first abortion in 1972. He worked as an epidemiologist at the Centers for Disease Control for nine
years, where he also served as the head of the abortion surveillance branch. He
is also a former faculty member at the medical schools of Emory University, the
University of Southern California, the University of California-San Francisco,
and the University of North Carolina. He retired from the University of North
Carolina School of Medicine in 2014, where he was formerly a clinical
professor in the department of obstetrics and gynecology.
Research
Grimes
has been described as "a leading researcher and abortion provider".
In 2012, he co-authored a review article that found that legal abortion was
"markedly safer than childbirth".
"Although
abortion has been legal nationwide for more than a quarter century, access
remains difficult for many women." – Dr David Alan Grimes
[PHOTO
SOURCE: http://likesuccess.com/823725]
|
Abortion Practitioner
David Grimes Has Killed Babies in Abortions for 42 Years and Has No Regrets
National Micaiah Bilger Nov 3,
2016 | 3:46PM Washington, DC
David Grimes recently retired from the abortion
business after 42 years, but he still actively promotes the life-destroying
procedure.
The women’s magazine Cosmopolitan
profiled him in a new piece that highlights abortionists who began their
work before Roe v. Wade.
Grimes started aborting unborn babies while he was
in medical school in the early 1970s, according to the article. He said he was
studying medicine at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill when the
state legalized abortion – three years before Roe v. Wade.
Grimes continued:
But there were restrictions in the state law — you had to have two physicians who sign off their approval for the procedure. It was degrading for a woman to have to go before a panel of physicians to justify what she wants to do. When Roe v. Wade was decided, all the restrictive state laws like North Carolina’s were struck down as unconstitutional. What Roe v. Wade said, essentially, is in the first trimester, you can’t intervene between the doctor and patient.
But Grimes only told the half-truth. In Roe v.
Wade, coupled with its companion case Doe v. Bolton, the U.S.
Supreme Court justices allowed for abortions on demand for any reason through
all nine months of pregnancy – not just the first trimester, as he claimed.
Interestingly, the same Cosmo piece that profiled Grimes also highlighted the
work of late-term abortionist Curtis Boyd.
Grimes went on to talk about the unsafe, illegal
abortions that he witnessed prior to and immediately after the Roe decision.
During that time period, Grimes said he treated a number of women who were
suffering complications from illegal abortions.
He continued:
Back in the ’50s and ’60s, every major metropolitan hospital in the U.S. had a septic abortion ward. The most common reason for admission to gynecological services in America was complication of abortion. When I was a doctor at L.A. County hospital in 1986, my predecessors who’d trained there told me the septic abortion ward at that hospital was a 20-bed, U-shaped ward, and they had two private rooms. These private rooms were there so women could be alone with their families as they died from complications of illegal abortions, and those rooms were always full. When the California laws changed in 1967 and abortion became legal in the state, those wards emptied, closed, and were converted to other uses.“It was horrible carnage — and every one of those deaths was preventable,” he added. “These women weren’t dying of exotic diseases. They were dying of simple things like hemorrhage and infection, and any third-year medical student with adequate equipment could’ve easily handled it.”
Of course, when Grimes said every death was
preventable, he meant only women, not their unborn babies.
Keep up with the latest pro-life
news and information on Twitter.
“But the reason those women were dying is because the country had not yet made the decision that these women’s lives are worth saving. It’s just one of the ugly manifestations of misogyny, and it needs to be understood as such. It was a profound disdain of women and their autonomy,” he continued.
Grimes said he respects women to make their own
decisions about abortion. He implied that he wants to save women’s lives by
protecting them from dangerous, back alley abortions. But his actions show a
very different picture.
Grimes is one of abortion activists’ go-to
“experts” who denies basically any research that shows how abortions can
increase risks to women’s health.
When Canadian filmmaker Punam Kumar Gill recently
decided to investigated whether the link between abortion and breast cancer was
real or just something made up by pro-lifers, her documentary crew interviewed
Grimes.
“The jury is in,” Grimes said
in Gill’s documentary “HUSH.” “What we now know is that there are no long-term consequences
from abortion, and that includes psychological effects as well.”
But Gill, who, like Grimes, believes abortion
should be legal, continued with her research and came to the conclusion that
Grimes is wrong. She found a number of studies showing that abortions do put
women at greater risk of breast cancer, future preterm birth, psychological
problems and more. Gill’s film concluded that at the very least, there is not
enough research to confirm what Grimes said, and there is research showing the
opposite to be true. She argued that women should be fully informed about
possible risks before having an abortion.
Grimes does not support measures that protect women
either. He publicly opposed abortion facility regulations that were written
specifically to protect women from modern-day, “back alley”-type abortionists
like Kermit Gosnell and Steven Brigham. Rather than support these protective
measures, Grimes described them as “sinister” in a 2014 interview with
ThinkProgress.
Unlike Grimes, pro-lifers want to save both lives
from abortion – unborn babies and women. We believe that women deserve to be
fully informed about the possible risks of abortion and the life of their child
in the womb. And we do not want either a woman or her unborn child to die a
horrible, unnecessary death.
INTERNET
SOURCE:
http://www.lifenews.com/2016/11/03/abortion-practitioner-david-grimes-has-killed-babies-in-abortions-for-42-years-and-has-no-regrets/ & https://web.facebook.com/LifeNews/posts/10154383562953598
http://www.lifenews.com/2016/11/03/abortion-practitioner-david-grimes-has-killed-babies-in-abortions-for-42-years-and-has-no-regrets/ & https://web.facebook.com/LifeNews/posts/10154383562953598
OTHER
LINKS:
No comments:
Post a Comment